Comments for Robert's C# Musings

Comment on Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors by Mark

Mark — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:50:39 +0000

This is absolutely awesome

Comment on Over-solving FizzBuzz by John Sonmez

John Sonmez — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:37:10 +0000

Very cool. I have a similar implementation at:
http://simpleprogrammer.com/2009/12/19/lambda-extensible-fizzbuzz-2-0-with-linq/

Comment on Practical Introduction to Lambda Expressions by Cyril Gupta

Cyril Gupta — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:15:34 +0000

Nice introductory article on lambda. Thoroughly enjoyed. Thanks

Comment on Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors by Robz

Robz — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:57:02 +0000

This is freakin awesome! Crazy that we have to do this crap, but awesome!

Comment on Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors by Robert

Robert — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:30:37 +0000

Thank you, fixed (with one other bug)

Comment on Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors by Twitter Trackbacks for Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors | Robert's C# Musings [rvenables.com] on Topsy.com

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:01:18 +0000

[...] Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors | Robert’s C# Musings http://www.rvenables.com/2009/08/instantiating-classes-with-internal-constructors – view page – cached Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors, Scattered throughout the .NET framework are classes that are intended to appear externally sealed, but internally (by the framework class library developers) — From the page [...]

Comment on Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors by syntatic

syntatic — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:11:15 +0000

Looks like you forgot to genericize part of RMock.cs. It should use the generic on line 47.

Instead of this:
47: FieldInfo[] EventFields = typeof(DataReceivedEventArgs)

It should be this:
47: FieldInfo[] EventFields = typeof(T)

Comment on Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors by Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors emulator emulate

Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors emulator emulate — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:05:20 +0000

[...] See original here: Instantiating Classes with Internal Constructors [...]

Comment on Practical Introduction to Lambda Expressions by dave

dave — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:14:38 +0000

I really like the way you explain these things, and also your webpage looks very minimalistic on graphics or advertising or flash animations that annoy you and take your focus away from the content, but the most important thing is the quality of your details in what you tried to explain, look forword to read more c# tips from u, this first article that i read from u was very refreshing and well explained.
Dave

Comment on Black Belt C# Series - Syntax by Brian

Brian — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:33:33 +0000

@Robert

Yea seperate is fine. I would be happy with a different operator that reacts to dbnull with the clean ?? like syntax. For me, it wouldn’t hurt if they were combined into ??, I have sections where dbnulls are possible and sections where nulls are possible but rarely both.

I’ve seen alot of database code strewn with (value != System.dbnull ? value : “some message”) which is somewhat ugly.